Subject	but not as efficient, if the design were changed a bit
Posted by	Scotts94z32 on October 04, 2004 at 4:32 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	Water injection...cheaper and more practical. (n/m) posted by Milo (Sport Z Magazine) on October 04, 2004 at 09:55 AM
Message	the cooling capacity of LCO2 or LN2 is superior to the water injection method. SS ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Dad, you are my inspiration, and reason for living. May you find peace in your new place - 9/26/04
Follow Ups	DEI cryogenic intake... thoughts and opinions - zls 09:34:59 10/04/04 There is no room for that under our hood...also, - College Boy 09:41:07 10/04/04 Would also be difficult to get the cooling equal - which - boileralum 11:05:51 10/04/04 You are not wrong. Heat transfer of hot air to the >>> - ZUL8TR 11:18:47 10/04/04 Water injection...cheaper and more practical. (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 09:55:57 10/04/04 but not as efficient, if the design were changed a bit - Scotts94z32 16:32:25 10/04/04 Make me look bad again and it's pepper spray for you. :) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 08:58:15 10/05/04 LOL..I didn't disagree with you, but just appended your - Scotts94z32 09:42:17 10/05/04 I've talked about this a bit before... search a bit and you - Scotts94z32 16:30:57 10/04/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.